|
|
THE SUPERINTENDENT
THE KEY PERSON One of the most important activities that a board can perform is to hire a qualified and able superintendent to administer its schools on a day-to-day basis. The board’s efficiency is increased to the extent it is able to delegate authority and daily administrative functions to the superintendent and staff so the board can carry out its oversight functions of planning, policy making, interpreting and appraising. Because the superintendent holds the key administrative position in the school system, the board must employ the best person available.
SELECTION PROCESS KRS 160.352 requires a screening committee be established within 30 days of determination that a vacancy has occurred, or will occur, in the office of superintendent. The screening committee must be comprised of: two teachers, elected by the teachers; one board member, appointed by the board chairman; one principal, elected by the principals of the district; one parent, elected by the presidents of the parent-teacher organizations of the district; and one classified employee elected by the classified employees in the district. If a minority member is not elected or appointed to the screening committee in districts with a minority population of 8 percent or more, as determined by the enrollment on the preceding October 1, the committee membership shall be increased to include one minority parent. The minority parent member shall be elected by the minority parents in an election conducted by the school board. The attorney general’s office has stated that the screening committee may not deviate from this composition. Obviously missing from this configuration is representation from the community. Unless the additional minority parent is added, the screening committee is composed of three educators, a classified employee, and only two persons who are not employees of the district. Prior to appointing a superintendent, the board must consider the recommendations of the screening committee, but it is not bound by it. The use of the mandated screening committee does not preclude the use of other committees or consultants that would be of benefit to the board. The board might want to consider recommendations from other sources, such as university faculty members or an advisory group of business leaders. If the district has a strategic plan, the plan should provide guidance in the selection process. Regardless, the board should develop a carefully planned procedure that includes specific standards for selecting the superintendent. The responsibility for hiring a superintendent rests by law with the board of education. The superintendent is answerable to the board of education and the board of education is answerable to the community for the quality of education in the district. If the search goes well and the district hires a competent superintendent, the credit may be shared between the board and the screening committee. However, if the search goes poorly and an incompetent superintendent is hired, the blame is entirely the board’s. The board is responsible for hiring the superintendent, and it is the board that the community holds accountable.
BOARD RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE SELECTION PROCESS The board is responsible for: 1. Providing timely notice to teachers, principals and parent-teacher organizations of an impending vacancy in the office of superintendent. 2. Deciding whether to use professional search consultants or additional committees. (Attachment 2‑1) 3. Establishing a timeline for all phases of the search process. 4. Developing criteria for the superintendent position and instructing the screening committee regarding the same, including appropriate methods of screening, and legally permissible and impermissible screening criteria. 5. Advertising the position. 6. Establishing a procedure for receiving applications, corresponding with applicants, and ensuring the confidentiality of applications. 7. Providing the screening committee with originals or a copy of all applicant materials on or before the closing date for application. If a large number of applications are anticipated, the screening committee may be given available applications one or two weeks before the closing date and be provided the remainder as they come in. 8. Charging the committee on reasonable confidentiality of applicant materials. 9. Establishing the date for the screening committee to report to the board. The screening committee should not require more than a month or less than 10 days for screening. Give the screening committee as much time as possible without doing harm to the overall search. The amount of time allowed is contingent upon several factors, but chief among them is the time remaining until June 30. The later in the search year that a board hires, the fewer the number of well qualified candidates on the market. 10. Receiving, and giving consideration to, the report of the screening committee. The board is not required to hire from the recommendations of the screening committee. However, if the screening committee was responsible and did its work well, the committee's recommendations should receive serious consideration. 11. Interviewing such candidates as the board sees fit. 12. Hiring the superintendent and establishing the conditions of the contract. The board should not be expected to pay stipends to screening committee members for service on the committee.
SCREENING COMMITTEE RESPONSIBILITIES Screening may occur at three levels, and a committee may elect to do one, two, or all three processes: Paper screening, involving a review of resumes and other supporting materials; background checks, which include reference checks and employment histories; and interviewing, involving personal contact with the candidate. The screening committee has the following responsibilities:
The board may assign additional responsibilities to the screening committee if it chooses and the committee may accept those responsibilities if it chooses. The above may seem like a formidable, time-consuming procedure to follow. It is, no doubt, time consuming, but the selection of a superintendent is one of the most important decisions that a board will ever make. KSBA provides comprehensive consultative services to boards and screening committees. The board, of course, must make the final selection.
TERM OF OFFICE With the exception noted in the following paragraph, Kentucky law requires the term of office for a school superintendent to begin on July 1 following his/her appointment. The appointment may be for a term of one, two, three, or four years. Most authorities recommend that the term should be longer than one year because many highly qualified candidates are unwilling to accept a one-year appointment. Another drawback to a one-year term is that it provides so little time for the superintendent to demonstrate his/her abilities and for the board to evaluate performance. After the completion of a superintendent’s first contract or after four years, whichever comes last, the board of education may, no later than June 30, extend the contract of the superintendent for one additional year beyond the current term of employment. Following employment, a superintendent must establish residency in Kentucky.
THE SUPERINTENDENT’S TWO MAIN ROLES The superintendent has two major roles ‑ executive officer of the school system and chief educational advisor to the board. As executive officer, the superintendent has a duty to carry out all policies and rules and regulations established by the board. The superintendent has day-to-day charge of the entire school system and coordinates the work of all system personnel. As educational advisor to the board, the superintendent should recommend policies to the board for its consideration and should advise and counsel the board on all educational matters. However, this does not mean that the board, usually comprised of lay citizens, should not seek information, guidance, and counsel from other sources.
FUNCTIONS OF THE SUPERINTENDENT A list of the duties of the superintendent would be endless. Kentucky law has specified some of the major duties of that office:
In addition to these legal requirements, most authorities agree that the superintendent should continuously evaluate the schools and make recommendations for improvement, should evaluate the work of each staff member and make his/her findings available to the board, and should serve as the district’s representative to the public, keeping the community informed about the schools. In short, the superintendent should provide professional leadership for the school system.
POLICY MAKING vs. ADMINISTRATION The effective and efficient operation of a public school system depends on a harmonious and mutually satisfying working relationship between the board and the superintendent. Only when a spirit of good will and cooperation prevails in their relationship will the schools be administered optimally and the quality of education be maximized. It is frequently said that the board’s job is to make policies and the superintendent’s job is to administer the policies. While this is generally true, the separation of policy making from administration is not always clear-cut in practice. Although it is the board’s prerogative to make policy, this prerogative should not be exercised without first getting the professional advice and counsel of the superintendent. The board should give due consideration to the recommendations and proposals offered by the superintendent, evaluate them objectively, and accept or reject such proposals in a manner conducive to general harmony. Likewise, while the board should not involve itself in the details of administration, which it delegates to the superintendent, the board must insist that the superintendent keep it sufficiently informed so that the board can perform its oversight responsibility. The superintendent should expect and accept questions from the board regarding the operation of the schools. Demands and expectations of the board regarding operations should be made forthrightly and without apology and should be accepted by the superintendent in a manner conducive to general harmony. Only through understanding and acceptance of the separate roles can the district achieve its mission. Attachment 2-2 contains a list of parallel functions that should help clarify the division of effort between the board and superintendent. Keep in mind that the list is intended to be illustrative rather than exhaustive and that working in a spirit of cooperation and mutual respect is more important than adhering rigidly to the division of effort listed. For a similar list incorporating school council functions, please see Attachment 1 in Chapter 3.
EVALUATING THE SUPERINTENDENT One of the most important responsibilities of the board of education is evaluating the performance of the superintendent. Evaluation is not something that should occur once a year or when the superintendent's contract is up for renewal, but should be a continuous process. While there is no magic formula for making the evaluation easier, the board can make the process go more smoothly by following certain steps. For one thing, the superintendent should know in advance what he/she will be evaluated on and what process will be used; therefore, the superintendent and board should agree at the time of hiring on the major areas to be evaluated and the procedures to be used. Periodic evaluation conferences should be held during which a full and frank discussion of the superintendent's performance should take place. The board should inform the superintendent of the areas in which it believes he/she is doing an exemplary job and those where the board feels improvement is needed. Both parties should make suggestions for how to make improvements. Kentucky law requires that the superintendent be evaluated by a system developed by the local school board and approved by the state department of education. The guidelines for this evaluation are stated in KRS 156.101. Evaluation shall occur at least annually. The evaluation document is a public document and subject to the Open Records Act.
VACANCY PRIOR TO EXPIRATION OF CONTRACT If a vacancy occurs in the office of superintendent prior to the expiration of the term set by the board, the term expires on the date the vacancy occurs. The board may then appoint a superintendent for a new term that begins on the date of the new superintendent's appointment. A superintendent cannot resign his/her term and accept a new term from the same board of education prior to the expiration date of the present term. In the case of a vacancy in the office for an unexpired term, the board of education shall make the appointment so that the term will end on June 30. When a vacancy occurs during the period between a school board election and when the newly elected members take office, the position shall not be filled until the new members take office, but the board may appoint an acting superintendent to serve no more than six months. This appointment may be renewed once for a period not to exceed three months. A screening committee does not have to be established for the appointment of an acting superintendent.
REMOVAL OF A SUPERINTENDENT A superintendent may be removed for cause by a vote of four-fifths of the membership of a board of education and upon approval by the commissioner of education. If the board initiates the action, written notice setting out the charges for removal shall be made part of the board minutes and given to the superintendent. The board shall seek approval by the commissioner for removing the superintendent. The commissioner must investigate the accuracy of the charges made, evaluate the superintendent's overall performance during his/her appointment, and consider the educational performance of the students in the district. The commissioner must approve or deny the board’s request within 30 days of notification. The commissioner of education also may seek removal of a superintendent without the recommendation of a local board. In this avenue, the commissioner files written charges with the Kentucky Board of Education, stating that he/she has reason to believe a superintendent is guilty of immorality, misconduct in office, incompetence, willful neglect of duty or nonfeasance. Further, the state board, by a majority vote of its members, may bring charges without the recommendation of the commissioner. The superintendent involved must be provided with the written charges and notified of the date and place to appear before the state board to answer the charges. The superintendent may be represented by counsel and may subpoena witnesses. The decision of the state board may be appealed to the Circuit Court.
SUBORDINATE ADMINISTRATORS AND THE BOARD Subordinate administrators are responsible to their immediate supervisor and to the superintendent. Administrators have no direct administrative relations with the board and should be directly responsible to the superintendent or his/her designee. The board should give the superintendent the authority necessary to develop an efficient administrative organization and respect and observe his/her authority. This does not mean the board may not ever receive information or communicate with other district employees or administrators, but it does mean the board must be sensitive to the authority and position of the superintendent and not act in a way that undercuts, or gives the appearance of undercutting, the authority or position of superintendent.
Some controlling statutes and regulations in this chapter: KRS 160.352; KRS 156.101; KRS 160.290; KRS 160.350
ATTACHMENT 2‑1 ROLE OF PROFESSIONAL SEARCH CONSULTANT
Listed below are services that can be provided by a professional search consultant. A board may have the consultant perform all of the listed services or only selected services. The consultant should only assist the board. The board makes all decisions in the selection process and ultimately hires the superintendent. Any action taken by a consultant should be at the direction and approval of the board, and the consultant should be given specific instructions regarding his/her role.
Establishing selection criteria
Recruiting candidates
Screening candidates
Interviewing
Superintendent's Contract
Other
ATTACHMENT 2-2
# # # |
260 Democrat Drive
Frankfort, KY 40601
Phone: (800) 372-2962
Fax: (502) 695-5451
|
© 2004 Kentucky School Boards Association. |
Home | About KSBA | Site Map | Contact Us | Privacy Policy |